Picture
One of the proudest moments for a young mom or dad is hearing their baby utter what usually are its first words – “mama” or “dada.”  It’s a universal human experience – and while the words might sound a bit different depending on the language or culture, the meaning is just as consistent as the roles of mother and father have been.

But now, with the ascent of marriage redefiners comes the unfortunate fallout—necessitated by the change of definition— and that is the elimination of the words “mother” and “father.”   It’s happening just about everywhere where same-sex “marriage” has been legalized, but it’s more plainly obvious in France.  There, lawmakers seeking to adopt “gay marriage” also have stated their intent to prohibit the use of the words “mother” and “father” (well, actually “mère” and “père”) in all legal documents. 

The fact is, social science (and for that matter, common sense) has overwhelmingly shown the benefits of, and the distinctive roles that, mothers and fathers have in the lives of their children.  The Family Research Council website contains information and links making that case. 

However, as we see in the case of those promoting “gay marriage” in France, the redefinition of marriage has an impact far beyond the simple “allowing two people who love each other to marry – whatever their sex may be.”   As proponents of natural marriage have consistently argued, redefining marriage also means redefining the family unit, redefining parenthood and ultimately gravely impacting the well-being of children and society as a whole. Children deserve a mother and a father, and society should promote that goal.

A French commission established several years ago by Parliament concluded in 2006 after about a year of research that prohibiting gay marriage was in France’s best interest in order to “affirm and protect children’s rights and the primacy of those rights over adults’ aspirations.” 
The committee acknowledged that while French families are becoming more varied, homosexual marriages should be prohibited for the sake of children’s well-being. That commission fully understood that you cannot redefine marriage without impacting children, whatever politicians or special interests might tell us. 

Cardinal Philippe Barbarin, Archbishop of Lyon, states that “gay marriage would herald a complete breakdown in society.”  He’s right.  The elimination of the words “mother” and “father” in legal documents is symbolic of the pending decline of the vital roles of husband and wife, mother and father that those words symbolize.  Words have meaning – and when we are prohibited from using them, the particular thing they represent will be diminished and eventually destroyed as well.

Marriage and family is the cornerstone of society. Fathers and mothers have distinct and necessary roles in raising children.  Strong families mean strong communities, and strong communities mean a strong country.

Not long after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court imposed same-sex “marriage” on that Commonwealth in 2004, state-issued birth certificates were changed.  Originally listing the name of “mother” and “father,” the dawn of “gay marriage” made those distinct positions archaic or dated.  In their place are “Parent A” and “Parent B.”  I wonder what sort of reeducation will be needed to make babies say that as their first words.

 


Comments

Braden Domier
10/15/2012 5:01pm

Absolutely. I think the logical conclusion of allowing gay marriage is "baby re-education camps". Love the journalism on this site!

Reply
10/17/2012 3:45pm

journalism... this is an opinion piece supported by facts... it's not supposed to be journalism

Reply
Braden Domier
10/17/2012 4:13pm

Love the "opinion piece supported by facts" which totally leads to the conclusion that we'll have baby re-education camps!! I truly believe that the author could find no other conclusion.

Morgan Freeman
10/22/2012 5:01pm

yea I love all the facts that support this opinion. You know, like the fact that children raised by two gay parents are fucked up in the head. Oh wait, that's right that has been disproven time and time again. Fuck off author, if gay people want to get married then they will. It literally doesnt affect your life in anyway, and I'm sure if gay people wanted to take away a basic right of yours, lets say women's sufrage because women can't make sound logical decisions, then you would be pissed. you dont deserve anything but shit you bitch

Reply
"Morgan Freeman" Re-education camp?
10/23/2012 6:00am

Given your colorful and choice language, perhaps the real Morgan Freeman woud be embarrassed by your lack of taste. Perhaps not. You're allowed to have your own opinion; I support free speech and healthy debate. But maybe try to read better and understand the author's argument, instead of substituting intelligence for swear words? It's been said that those who can't speak or argue well, borrow cuss words since they have nothing better to say.

Reply
Trevor
10/24/2012 7:29pm

The dude was just making a point with his freedom of speech. His opinions are his and you can't change them by berating him like that. I think your comment is incredibly rude and I felt that it attacked the author rather than debate his opinion.

Reply
A sensible conservative
11/06/2012 12:09am

Miss Geer, everywhere you wrote "same-sex" or "gay" or anything of the sort, replace it with "black" and see how incredibly ignorant it sounds. Both are a state of being that people are born into. One was freed from most civil rights abuse in the 60's and one will hopefully be freed sometime in the near future. But both had bible bashing Christians making excuses about why things should be denied to them.

Reply
Someone_with_common_sense
11/20/2012 2:24am

I'm sorry what research shows that having two same sex parents is bad for a child? The fact that gay marriage is still a discussion is disgusting, telling people they can't get married because people think its wrong or because the bible says so( ever heard of separation of church and state?) is ridiculous. It is a right to love whoever you want to and to be treated as a second class citizen because you not being normal makes some ignorant assholes unco

Reply
Someone_with_common_sense
11/20/2012 2:25am

(Continued) un comfortable is pathetic and archaic.

Reply
Mary Seward
01/10/2013 4:37pm

Excellent article Becca! I agree with everything you said and you put it so well! Nice job! :)

Reply

This is the perfect blog for anyone who wants to know about this topic. The article is nice and its pleasant to read. I have known very important things over here. I admire the valuable advice you make available in your expertly written content. I want to thank you for this informative read; I really appreciate sharing this great.

Reply
Skeptical
02/12/2013 11:28am

I challenge you to show me one unbiased, scientific study that actually proves that being raised in a household with one mother and one father is better for a child than two men or two women.

I believe I have read all the ones furnished by the Family Research Council, and none live up to that standard.

Reply



Leave a Reply


UA-36493214-1