Picture
On Wednesday, Floyd Lee Corkins II, who was responsible for the  Family Research Council shooting on August 15, 2012, plead guilty to three charges, which included committing an act of terrorism. 

While interviewed by the FBI, Corkins admitted that he wanted to "kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims' faces, and kill the guard."

I was one of those people who could have been his victim. I was on the 6th floor of the FRC building working on my pro-life internship assignments. I could have lost my life. My dear friend Rosa and everyone else in the building, including my boss Jeanne Monahan, now president of March for Life, could have lost their lives. 

That fateful day has only reminded me of how precious life truly is and how important it is to live every day as if it is your last. I thank God every day that our building manager, Leo Johnson, prevented Corkins from carrying out his intended act of violence. Leo's courage and strength helped prevent what could have been a heartbreaking tragedy. Leo is a real hero that I will continue to thank for the rest of my life.  

It saddens me and brings tears to my eyes that a person like Corkins would resort to violence out of political disagreement, especially on the topic of gay marriage. It breaks my heart that Southern Poverty Law Center facilitated his intent to commit such a horrific act of violence by labeling FRC as a "hate group."

FRC is far from hateful. Its staff members are the most delightful, friendly, sweet, loving, caring, and Christ-like people you will ever meet. As a pro-life intern there this past summer, FRC became a home away from home for me. It is a safe haven in the middle of our nation's morally corrupt capital. My fellow interns have become some of my best friends. And I was incredibly blessed to have Jeanne Monahan as my mentor, who truly helped me to grow as a pro-life advocate. 

It is time to stop Southern Poverty Law Center labeling FRC, and other organizations that just want to make society a better place, as "hate groups." I only pray that people will learn from this shooting that  wrongful labels and violence are not ways to solve political disagreements. Let's stop the hate to prevent acts of violence like this shooting from occurring again.

 


Comments

brad essex
02/08/2013 7:30am

Thank god your safe as you and your sisters are my friends god bless you Anna.

Reply
Scott
02/08/2013 10:00am

The heading above the article says it all. FAUX MARRIAGE. Stop trying to push your will on people as well. If you don't want gay marriage, don't have one. Marriage isn't natural anymore than going to work. They are human constructs.

Reply
Bill
02/08/2013 10:08am

Sorry to burst your fantasy, Scott, but it's not "our" will but God's. You can deny him and ignore him but one day , you will be standing before him with no valid excuse.

Reply
Earl
02/08/2013 11:27am

So you don't contest her main point that the SPLC is contributing to the vitriol that caused someone to try to murder her. Instead, you resort to arguing about politics with her in the same manner that the lunatic did. In essence, you are agreeing with the lunatic that she is a valid target and that she could have avoided the whole situation if she had just shut up and accepted your/Corkins' political views.

Reply
Earl
02/08/2013 11:30am

Scott, that would be like hearing an argument from a Jew about how Nazis are contributing towards Jew hating, and then telling the Jew that they should just stay out of Germany's business.

And by the way, all laws are human constructs, including the one that says you should be respected as a human. Human rights aren't "natural", either.

Reply
Jo
02/09/2013 1:48am

And you're not pushing your philosophy? To think that marriage is just the same as going to work, that it's a human construct with no special regard, says much about your respect for marriage. Why do you even want marriage when it's so trivial? I'd suspect it's mostly to legally have the country agree with you that a gay couple is just the same as having both a father and a mother, rather than being bound by a "human construct."

Reply
robert108
02/09/2013 10:34am

Wrong. Real marriage is an extension of basic human biology, wherein a male and a female have sex to produce offspring. That natural biological urge brings men and women together for many other purposes, including forming the basic matrix of human society, which is based on marriage relationships stretching back over many generations.
The homosexual lifestyle choice includes none of this, and does not contribute to the survival of the human species.
What homosexuals do together is not marriage. Find another word, and stop trying to hijack what doesn't belong to you.

Reply
Willow
02/09/2013 3:09pm

"Real marriage is an extension of basic human biology, wherein a male and a female have sex to produce offspring."

So then you feel that virtually all women over the age of 50, younger women who have had hysterectomies or oophorectomies, men who have had orchiectomies, and others who are unable to procreate should be denied the right to marry as well, correct?

Jay Stevens
02/09/2013 10:16pm

Willow, stop putting words in his mouth. Robert did not say that.

Jay Stevens
02/09/2013 10:17pm

Oh; and you ARE avoiding the main point of the article.

Regina
02/08/2013 10:11am

Scott, perhaps you should read past the headline and read the article.

Anna Maria made the wise point that a political disagreement does not need to turn into something ugly. Where do Anna Maria's rights end? Where you say, "Stop trying to push your will on people" ? Is that where her rights end? At your opinion and command? You are doing exactly what you accuse her of.

In a country that values free speech and differences of opinion, you seem a bit out of step.

Reply
Scott (a different one)
02/08/2013 11:43am

I believe the reason the SPLC list all of these people and organizations as "Hate groups" is because they hope some of their whack job followers will resort to violence. If you observe most acts of violence in this country, it comes from the left simply because we refuse to believe what they believe.

Reply
rupert
02/09/2013 11:13am

Have you seen this? A taliban sympathizer arrested after planning bombings he hoped would be pinned on the 'right-wing extremists' groups (you know, like anybody that doesn't agree with leftist ideology) and begin a civil war.
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/08/fbi-arrests-taliban-sympathizer-who-wanted-to-bomb-oakland-bank-and-frame-right-wing-groups-to-start-a-civil-war/

Reply
a. mcewen
02/08/2013 12:16pm

Ma'am, SPLC had nothing to do with that demented man's actions. I don't know who put u up to write this but you are pushing a serious deception. And I am glad that the Family Research Council treats you so well. It's probably because you are not gay. FRC calls us terrorists, tools of Satan and pedophiles. Members of FRC, such as Peter Sprigg, want to see us either deported or in jail for being gay. And I haven't even mentioned the junk science propaganda FRC pushes against us. I am glad that Corkins was stopped but you are clearly working for a hate group. If u blame SPLC for Corkins then u should blame FRC for anti-gay violence.

Reply
Gabriella Hoffman
02/08/2013 12:34pm

The distinction between FRC and SPLC is quite clear. SPLC's "hate group" post was greatly referenced and used by Floyd Corkins to commit this mass murder plan. Alternatively, FRC hasn't inspired people to commit violent acts against other Americans. Please take that into consideration. People like you are a detriment to civil discourse.

Reply
Samuel Watts
02/08/2013 9:12pm

Gabriella,
You say: "Alternatively, FRC hasn't inspired people to commit violent acts against other Americans."
Wake up. Unless you mean to imply that gay people are not Americans.

Anna Maria
02/08/2013 12:37pm

Excuse me, but I wrote this myself, thank you very much. Your rhetoric is what is problematic and what is wrong with America, frankly. No matter what, folks like you will use any crisis to their advantage to further their political agenda. It does not shock me that you have no sympathy for innocent people whose lives were put in danger thanks to SPLC's "hate group" list.

Reply
Anthony Ortiz
02/08/2013 2:06pm

I honestly don't care if FRC is a legitimate hate group or not. I also don't accept every statement from SPLC about a specific group being a hate group. What I do care about is the fact that ANYONE after facing a life and death situation is trying to blame someone else in such a deluded manner. Corkins was obviously the person trying to kill people at FRC. Corkins was not a part of SPLC. He also was not paid by them to harm others at FRC. Therefore, Corkins is an individual. If the man made a decision to murder others based on propaganda, then obviously, it's working despite the fact that our society has the greatest advancements in the history of man available to them for research purposes. For you to blame SPLC for Corkins' decision is like blaming the beer distributor for selling a man beer that he drank later, then decided to murder his wife and kids because the man at the distributor said that he hates women and children. Please stop trying to confound an already complicated political argument just because someone went off their rocker and tried to murder innocent people because HE felt he was doing what SPLC wanted him to do (which, despite how much they want the world their way, they likely don't want people murdered in their name).

I feel for your situation. It's not fun to be on the business end of a firearm pointed in your direction. No one should have to feel uneasy about going to work because of whackjobs. However, there's no reason to try and manipulate others into disliking political groups that you don't like. You don't want to be like the people that are already doing that, and you most certainly don't want someone to go out and kill because YOU said that SPLC is a hate group.

Jo
02/09/2013 1:52am

Labeling a group as a "hate group" is different than opposing gay "marriage" and preserving conservative values. FRC does the latter, but not the former, and does condemn violence and hatred towards our LGBT brothers and sisters. SPLC does the former and this was used as a kill list by this would be killer. This is the difference and SPLC should come out and take responsibility for its hateful words.

Reply
robert108
02/09/2013 10:39am

You and your followers have slaughtered 55 million babies and counting. No one wants to jail you for making your lifestyle choice; it's about your behaviors, like molesting "boy toys", and parading around in your fetish outfits in public in places like SF.
Your beliefs don't entitle you to violate human decency in public.
You wish to destroy our society by destroying marriage and the fabric of human society, in your fanatic zeal to force the rest of us to regard what you do as "normal".

Reply
rupert
02/09/2013 2:04pm

Any examples of anti-gay violence? I mean besides those hoaxes gays have perpetrated in an effort to demonize others.

Reply
K. Schmidtmann
02/08/2013 5:02pm

'If they want to be ignorant, let them be ignorant'! You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make make 'em drink. is so true! Makes me thank Father God for the Truth, and we are very thankful that God protected you all from this sad plan of this man! We know who was behind it all!

Reply
02/08/2013 6:08pm

WASHINGTON

February 8, 2013

"It is time to stop Southern Poverty Law Center labeling FRC, and other organizations that just want to make society a better place, as "hate groups." I only pray that people will learn from this shooting that wrongful labels and violence are not ways to solve political disagreements. Let's stop the hate to prevent acts of violence like this shooting from occurring again."

Dear Ms. Hoffman,

The problem is that you do not seem to understand that this battle is not over religious beliefs. It is over the fact that organisations like FRC continue to lie about the LGBTQ community.

The shooter at FRC was not an agent of the SPLC nor was he motivated by the appearance of FRC on a Hate Group watch list because of the lies FRC has spread and continues to spread about fellow citizens who are LGBTQ.

In the recent battle over the Boy Scouts, FRC has outlined the following deceptions and made the following claims:

The LGBT community is viewed entirely as adult gay men.

The only aspect of a person that defines a gay identity is participation in same-sex sexual behavior.

Nothing is apparently more important to gay men than having as much sex as possible and talking about it at all times.

For gay men, there is no difference between being attracted to other adult gay men and being attracted to underage boys.

Gay men are so obsessed with having sex that consent means nothing to them.

Even though the men most commonly found abusing boys identify as heterosexual, the fact that their victims were boys means that they must be secretly gay, as opposed to just being pedophiles.

It’s impossible for a child to learn that gay people even exist without becoming “sexualized” and somehow put at risk.

So long as homosexuality is prohibited, all Boy Scouts will remain totally chaste and never think, learn about, or talk about the existence of sex.

The larger reality is that FRC and similar groups believe that their so called brand of Christianity is superior to all other religions or non-believers and that unless the populace embraces their world and cultural view they are abominations, evil, twisted, etc.

The U.S. Constitution embraces the idea that Americans must have free speech and freedom of religion, the problem is that FRC and other groups make no allowances for that hence in fact, with their methodology and lying tactics, they are in fact hate groups.

Muslims? Buddhists? Nonbelievers? Vilified by these so-called Christians.

Finally Ms. Hoffman, the deaths of hundreds of LGBTQ youths who killed themselves over being bullied and gay-bashed can be laid at the doorsteps of any of these so-called christian groups.

There is nothing wrong, evil, twisted about the LGBTQ community madam. but there's alot wrong with hypocritical attitudes of FRC and other groups who have become little more than modern day Pharisees.

Should you wish to discuss this further, please feel free to contact me.

Brody Levesque
Washington Bureau Chief
LGBTQNation Magazine * LGBTQNation.com

Reply
Jo
02/09/2013 2:03am

Brody,

Those are your interpretations of what FRC states. I do see some of your points, and so it's important that both sides work to help all of us live with respect, despite our difference in values where we are free to have our own opinions. SPLC designation for FRC and other conservative groups as a "hate group" was used by the perpetrator for his list and investigators did state this. This is unfortunate but true. SPLC should take some responsibility. A mere difference of opinions and values does not mean "hate" as many of us preach actively against such violence in words or actions towards the LGBT community and to ALL (including Muslims, Buddhists, etc.)!

Why do you put sole responsiblity of suicides of gay teens and adults on Christianity or others that view homosexual actions as sin or morally wrong? Those that commit suicide also bear a huge burden of responsibility as they made that choice, along with those that did bully them. You cannot equate disapproval with bullying, though some take disapproval a step further into bullying.

Reply
02/09/2013 6:58am

WASHINGTON

February 9 2013

Dear Jo,

I have been a working journalist for well over 3 decades and it is my job to lay out the facts. You may chose to interpret them based on your perceptions of what I have written, which is precisely the purpose and mission of my career filed.

The problem is that no one has the right to declare an immutable characteristic of any human being as "as sin or morally wrong" anymore than being prejudiced because of a person's race or gender identity.

In the past 3 years I have written entirely way too many stories about LGBTQ youth, whose deaths were the direct result of bullying fostered in an intolerant atmosphere promulgated by religious teachings or indoctrination.

Bluntly though Jo? I can tell you with 100% certainly that religion is a choice where as being LGBTQ is not.

Factor common sense into the equation as well. Do you honestly think that any LGBTQ person would willing "choose" to be LGBTQ knowing the horrid discrimination and vitriol that would be visited upon them?

I have reported from all stretches of this globe in my career and I have seen that for the most part, religion plays the principal factor in shedding of blood and the destruction of the basic goodness of humanity.

The last point of they chose to self eliminate? I'll be kind here, but bluntly put, that is a judgement based obviously on little or no facts. I have talked to may of the families of these youths. They saw no other way out of their torment. Of course it has been my experience that your type of so-called christian beliefs really doesn't care.

That belief and statement reflects the tragic consequences of something good run amok. In this case your so called christian beliefs.

Finally, SPLC pointed out the deceptions. lies, and intolerance is all.
FRC and even AFA and the others choose to continue to claim and maintain that they are the superior in this battle and that is where the mistake is. Blame SPLC Jo? No, that is a case of "Don't kill the messenger because of the message."

Sincerely,


Brody Levesque

02/09/2013 6:58am

WASHINGTON

February 9 2013

Dear Jo,

I have been a working journalist for well over 3 decades and it is my job to lay out the facts. You may chose to interpret them based on your perceptions of what I have written, which is precisely the purpose and mission of my career filed.

The problem is that no one has the right to declare an immutable characteristic of any human being as "as sin or morally wrong" anymore than being prejudiced because of a person's race or gender identity.

In the past 3 years I have written entirely way too many stories about LGBTQ youth, whose deaths were the direct result of bullying fostered in an intolerant atmosphere promulgated by religious teachings or indoctrination.

Bluntly though Jo? I can tell you with 100% certainly that religion is a choice where as being LGBTQ is not.

Factor common sense into the equation as well. Do you honestly think that any LGBTQ person would willing "choose" to be LGBTQ knowing the horrid discrimination and vitriol that would be visited upon them?

I have reported from all stretches of this globe in my career and I have seen that for the most part, religion plays the principal factor in shedding of blood and the destruction of the basic goodness of humanity.

The last point of they chose to self eliminate? I'll be kind here, but bluntly put, that is a judgement based obviously on little or no facts. I have talked to may of the families of these youths. They saw no other way out of their torment. Of course it has been my experience that your type of so-called christian beliefs really doesn't care.

That belief and statement reflects the tragic consequences of something good run amok. In this case your so called christian beliefs.

Finally, SPLC pointed out the deceptions. lies, and intolerance is all.
FRC and even AFA and the others choose to continue to claim and maintain that they are the superior in this battle and that is where the mistake is. Blame SPLC Jo? No, that is a case of "Don't kill the messenger because of the message."

Sincerely,


Brody Levesque

Nita McCullough
02/11/2013 10:05am

Mr. Levesque,
I have read articles from the FRC and your wording of the FRC's statements about homosexuals are very misleading and hateful. Christians do not hate the person, just as God does not hate the person. God and his true followers hate the acts. If you want the truth about the Creator, then you need to do the research of a working journalist. Read Leviticus 18:22, 1 Corinthians 6:9, and 1 Timothy 1:9-10. Marriage between a man and a woman is symbolic of the church as explained in Ephesians 5:22-33. Lastly, King Solomon admonishes us that we are not to be wise in our own eyes, but we should fear the Lord, and depart from evil (Proverbs 3:7). There is a way that seems right unto man; but the end thereof leads to death Proverbs 14:12). His words are my words. His love and wisdom come first above all things.

Reply
02/11/2013 11:00am

WASHINGTON

February 11, 2013

Ms. McCullough,

There's absolutely no point in engaging you in discourse over these issues. You immediately quoted your bible and frankly, in secular environs, it has little or no bearing.

You have absolutely every right to have your faith and belief systems. As do Muslims, Buddhists, Hindi, Non-believers and even pagans. However, this sense of primacy your faith deploys against their fellow citizens is harmful, destructive and belittle other people's humanity which is what I take exception to.

You have absolutely no right to demonise those who are not christian. Nor do you have right to cite passages from a book that has deep flaws in its translations and messages which relies on an assumption that it is above all else. The problem with that thinking is that you automatically exclude a large part of the rest of this planet and that is simply wrong.

Your own founding fathers were careful to keep religious doctrines OUT of the government and its creation. But then again, precious few modern christians residing inside the borders of the United States these days seem to understand that.

Your blind adherence to your faith is admirable but when you demean the LGBTQ community with that faith, then, like FRC and the rest of the so-called "family values" christian groups, you've crossed a line you are not entitled to and are quite frankly wrong to.

I said this before, FRC being listed as a hate group is not based on religious belief, it is based on the lies that group continues to spread.

I personally do not hate christians by the way, I however most emphatically wish that they would mind their own business and if they are going to contribute well to humanity, then by all means do so without the preaching that all others are living out of their definition of grace.


Brody Levesque

Samuel Watts
02/08/2013 9:08pm

Brody,
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Violence is never a good thing but the message espoused by FRC promotes it. Their message is one of clear intolerance towards those who are different than they are, who believe differently than they do.
Innocent children who happen to be gay are being hurt by FRC. Their message is not one of love. To claim it is would be a falsehood.

Reply
robert108
02/09/2013 10:49am

Disagreement with your lifestyle choice(not "immutable" at all) is not intolerance, it is the right of every American. The violent response of your "community" to any disagreement with your political agenda rises to the level of terrorism, but political and economic. Your attempt to shut down Chik-fil-A should have been punished with the full force of law.
The Fourth Amendment entitles every American to not be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law.
Your "community" wants to deprive all other Americans of that right when they disagree with your choices.
Shame on you.

Reply
02/09/2013 3:39pm

WASHINGTON

February 9 2013

Re: " The Fourth Amendment entitles every American to not be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law.
Your "community" wants to deprive all other Americans of that right when they disagree with your choices."

The problem is Robert, that your train of thought and that of your like minded fellow citizens only makes allowances for YOUR way.

What is shameful is that 21 year old college student was beaten and then left tied up to a fence on a cold Wyoming prairie to die only because he was gay.

So using your logic, it was perfectly ok for Matthew Shepard to be murdered because of your perceptions of a choice which by the way is erroneous and even if it was, then you're ok with his death like that?

My Robert, how so very "christian" of you.

My only shame sir is that in my travels as a reporter, I have met more of your so-called christians than those who actually practise what that poor Jewish carpenter was calling for in his preaching.

Oh and boycotts? So Dr. Martin Luther King and his followers should have been punished for their boycotts against the injustices they suffered during the civil rights movement according to your logic.

How about 'shame on you' Robert.

Brody Levesque

truthbetold
02/09/2013 11:02am

Mr. Brody and Samuel,

While I do not agree with Perkins and I do not like his politics, he has a right to express them. I think Mr. Perkins is disingenuous and his politics are harmful to freedom (I say this because Mr. Perkins would endorse a communist as long as there was an R behind his name). That said, this young lady on here is exactly right. The SPLC is a hate group, full of bigots and liars. They distribute their material to law enforcement and most law enforcement tell me that they would like to wipe their behind with the SPLC's report. Furthermore, why is it that people like yourself think it is ok to go and bully people like the Boy Scouts into accepting your version of what is right and wrong. You are not right, you are WRONG. It is wrong to attempt to FORCE your views on another organization. Why not start your own? I guess most people will disagree with another version of NAMBLA. You are the most intolerant and bigoted people of all. Hey, I do not believe in a marriage license either since it is a religious function and not that of the state. Therefore, I am no threat to gays. They have a right to do what they want as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. It is your type that are no better than a communist country as you go about trying to force your lifestyle on people that do not want no part of it. Who is anti-freedom here? Religion has been counter-productive in most countries but let us be real here, you would abolish the right of a Christian to peaceably assemble if you had a choice so you are the one who is anti-freedom here.

Reply
02/09/2013 1:56pm

Ahhh, the truth comes out. Brody is more concerned with bullied LGTBQ kids than bullying in general... The issue with bullied LGTBQ kids isn't their orientation, it's a lack of love in our society. Opposing gay marriage does not require bullying LGBTQ people...just as differences in opinion doesn't require ad hominem arguments as most of the comments against Anna Maria include. The issue with bullying LGBTQ kids and psychopaths shooting up an organizations building come from the same problem: HATE. Don't attack hate for the sake of one fraction of the population. Fight hate with love and don't focus on one group.

Reply
Dr D
02/09/2013 3:51pm

Brody, for a journalist of three decades, you are a poor communicator and your grasp of logic is sadly lacking. Your posts are emotionally charged and present your interpretations of others' positions as if they were actual statements made by the others. You would be more persuasive if you included the actual quotations, but had you done that you certainly wouldn't have had the effect you were striving for.

You wrote, "Do you honestly think that any LGBTQ person would willing (sic) 'choose' to be LGBTQ knowing the horrid discrimination and vitriol that would be visited upon them?" You were correct when you said that people choose to be Christians, but do you recognize the hatred and vitriol that is visited upon us by non-Christians? Christians are blamed for ills throughout the world. Some of those ills were caused by people professing to be Christians but we're all lumped into the same group and blamed collectively for the sins of a few. We choose to be Christians even though we are blamed, marginalized, and mocked. You said yourself, "religion plays the principal factor in shedding of blood and the destruction of the basic goodness of humanity." You disregard the countless lives that are saved and improved by Christian charities throughout the world. People make lifestyle choices based upon their beliefs and convictions, even if it opens them up to ridicule and mockery, and those choices happen on both sides of the political aisle..

If we disagree with the idea of gay marriage, we're labeled "homophobic." We aren't afraid of homosexuals, but we disagree with their behavior. Will it advance Christianity if we label people such as you "Christophobes?" Probably not, because name-calling is a childish way of responding to someone with whom you disagree. Are tensions raised or reduced when one group labels another a "hate group"?

As for your comment about homosexual kids choosing to "self-eliminate" they absolutely made that choice. They might not have felt that they had a better choice, but they had a choice nonetheless.

Finally, Ms. Hoffman was pointing out the direct connection that Floyd Lee Corkins II made to the SPLC, yet you find that to be of no consequence. Since you have studied so many youth suicides, do you have any evidence that directly connects any such suicide to statements made by the FRC? If so, you would strengthen your argument by posting it. If the FRC has done this amazingly horrible job of prompting homophobes to beat up gay kids, I would think there would be scientific studies - or at least suicide notes - to show the connection. Since you didn't bother to make such a connection in your previous posts it's probably safe to assume that none exists. Society would be better served if inflammatory rhetoric were reduced and people engaged in well-reasoned, logical, adult conversations.

Reply
02/09/2013 4:27pm

Well, I for one gay man doesn't think the FRC is a "hate group" -- I think they are a delusional group. Oh, I'm sure they do wonderful things for hetero families, and I'm sure they are all decent people -- but, when it comes to gay folks and what we are doing, they are so delusional one could write a book.

Let's face it, the FRC wants gay folks to get up tomorrow at 9 AM and stop being gay! And we keep telling you all, we're born this way by God's good Grace -- then, you call us liars and sick and demented -- and then, sure, maybe we are -- but I doubt we could get disability - -and I'm sure being sick and demented and psychologically stunted we are then covered by the American with Disabilities Act.

Meanwhile, when I read the descriptions of "homosexuality" and what those folks are doing, I'm against "homosexuality" too -- except, well, those people don't exist. Instead, there's just us gays. And, in all the flying around the nation that the FRC do to stop a nice word about gay men ever -- the FRC folks simply have to be aided and abetted by the gay men who fill the jobs at airlines, conference centers and hotels. It's rather funny, then, to think that grown men obsessed with gay men can't see that they are being helped, politely, within their job functions, by gay folks. Like I said, it's not "hate" -- they can't hate the nice man at the check in counter, can they? No. 'Tis delusion, and nothing more.

Meanwhile, one crazed idiot does not a gay movement make.

Reply
Ley
02/09/2013 9:05pm

The Left is preparing for political violence, plain and simple. What we are seeing now, in this very comment thread, is the same dynamic observed in all pre-genocidal societies.

Just a couple of key elements that I'll briefly mention: 1. The attribution of moral turpitude to opposing political beliefs (not just wrong, but evil). 2. The attribution of all societal ills to one's political opponents. 3. The politicization of EVERYTHING (mirroring Mussolini's statement "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state"). 4. As a corollary to 3, the use of every available cultural institution to amplify this hyper-politicization. 5. The appearance of sporadic violence by lone individuals (the vanguard of the coming popular violence).

The Bolsheviks behaved this way prior to the Russian Revolution and the Holodomor. The Turks behaved this way prior to the Armenian Genocide. The Germans behaved this way prior to the Holocaust. The Hutus behaved this way prior to their efforts to slaughter their Tutsi rivals.

And now the American Left is preparing to "cut the tall trees down." 1. Conservatives aren't just wrong, they're evil (homophobic, driving gay teens to suicide, etc.). 2. Conservatives are the source of all societal ills (greed, hate, murder, violence, rape, financial crimes, poverty, racism). 3 and 4. Progressivism is forced on the population everywhere. Academia, religion, mass media, fashion, the theater (including especially film), and every other major societal institution are all used to amplify progressivism uber alles. No conservatives need apply. 5. Numerous examples abound, from the Al-Qaeda sympathizer who wanted to execute a false-flag terror attack and blame it on conservatives, to Chris Dorner (read the full manifesto, which the media has so conveniently censored), to this Corkins whack-job.

The vanguard is on the move. The main force will not be far behind unless we are somehow able to short-circuit this dynamic. The Left must be made to understand that theirs are not the only rights that should be respected, that it is inappropriate and dangerous to use the power of the state to destroy your political enemies (e.g. these frequent wedding cake/photography lawsuits). These would-be tyrants must be reined in.

I have absolutely no wish for this violence to come. Leftists love to imagine conservatives gleefully cheering as six year-olds are gunned down, or eagerly awaiting the Second Civil War. Hardly. The toll of human suffering would be so immense as to be beyond anything any of us has ever experienced in our lifetimes. It is to be avoided at almost all costs.

Notice I say almost. Because progressives should not mistake meekness for weakness. We will not allow you to fill the mass graves that always accompany socialism's worst excesses, not without a fight.

Reply
Jon
02/09/2013 9:56pm

Dear Ms. Hoffman,

I can't imagine how terifying almost being shoot was. Oh what I can. Try being gay in a red state. I understand how angry you must be with the SPLC and Cokins but you also forgot to lay balme at the FRC and your boss Tony Perkins. I agree we all need to have a civil discourse on this issue and both sides need to cool it. Lets start with the FRC not calling gay people child molesting sinners(I know this has never been stated like this on national telivision but it has been clearly implied) and the SPLC not labeling every one who disagrees with marriage equality hateful homophobic bigots.

Now I get that you have heard alot about "militant gay activist". You want to stop gay activist form being "militant", I am willing to tell you how. Step one:Be respectful. Step two: Be still. Step Three:listen with intrest. No one gets militant if they are being treated with human dignity but we all have our moments when we have had enough.

I noticed how nice you said the folks at the FRC are. I have one question can I being my friends and family to one of your office parties? I would love to introduce you to my one co-worker who is marrying her girlfriend next month(they are both very creative women). Or how about another of my co-workers and her wife with whom they are both raising a son who happens to be in the boy scouts(I find this werid because they are both women.). Or my best friend who is marrying her boyfriend her soon. Or finally me. An openly gay man who is very old fashioned about love, sex, dating and family (I want to get married then he can move in) and a christian.

Reply
02/10/2013 9:56pm

The FRC is a hate group and Anna-Maria presents no evidence to refute that except to say she knew nice people there. My related/response article.

http://www.pancakelanding.com/newsopinion/the-response-to-hate-shouldnt-be-violence/

Reply
Roger
02/11/2013 5:16am

I see hate and vitriol everywhere on this tab. No one on the left seems to have a problem with the SPLC having a hate group's list. But they did have a problem with Palin's targets. Why is one OK and the other not? I don't see any Christian compassion here either. If Christians really followed Christ, shouldn't they be more loving? God will judge us all at one point.

Reply
Tell It Like It Is
06/15/2013 1:15am

Ms. Hoffman, I suppose you don’t think your group is “endangering” the lives of gay people when your group puts bogus “studies” that gay people are frequent child molesters?! Nothing your group says is backed up by the American Psychological Association, nor the American Academy of Pediatrics, nor the Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute, nor Dr. A. Nicholas Groth, a pioneer in the field of sexual abuse of children whose work your group distorted which Dr. Groth wrote a letter to your group demanding to remove his name from a Family Research Council article about homosexual child molestation! Since when is painting gay people as child molesters supposed to be “teaching the love of Jesus Christ?!” Should we do the same thing with black people and Jews?! Your boss Tony Perkins also spoke many years ago at an event for the racist organization Council of Conservative Citizens and also has ties to a former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke who Perkins used Duke’s mailing list for a campaign! You want the FRC off the Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate group list? It’s simple: Stop putting out bogus “studies” saying that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than heterosexuals! So many times I hear about gay people being referred to as “faggot child molesters” from bigots and hate sites, where does the “child molester” myth about gay people come from? Groups like yours that continue to spew out that kind of fear and hatred that makes these people hate gay people! Instead of blaming the SPLC for this crime, maybe you and your group should look at yourselves to blame for all the garbage you say about gay people! While I don’t condone the actions of Floyd Lee Corkins II, he most likely got fed up with your group saying bad things about gay people instead of hearing the SPLC say your group is a hate group! Grow up! YOU BETTER PRAY MS. HOFFMAN THAT NO ONE EVER GOES OUT TO KILL GAY PEOPLE BECAUSE HE READ FROM YOUR GROUP’S WEBSITE ABOUT GAYS BEING CHILD MOLESTERS, BECAUSE IF THAT EVER HAPPENS IS WHEN THE FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS ARE GOING TO COME AFTER YOUR GROUP WITH A LAWSUIT TO SHOW YOU AND THE REST OF THE FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL THE TRUE MEANING OF “PRO-FAMILY”!!!

Reply



Leave a Reply


UA-36493214-1